ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effect of Bioactive Restorative Materials on Secondary Caries Prevention
This manuscript presents a 24-month randomised clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of bioactive restorative materials in preventing secondary caries compared with conventional composite restorations. Four restorative materials were tested in 120 class I and II cavities among high-caries-risk adults: conventional composite (Filtek Z350 XT), glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP), giomer (Beautifil II), and Cention N.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials and Techniques on Pulpal Condition#857228
- Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations#811030
- Clinical Performance of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth#887652
- Restorative Treatment of Severe Tooth Wear; Direct vs Indirect#980421
- Contemporary Restorative Materials in Primary Molars#1101616
Record · ID 807198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive