Carbetocin Versus Buccal Misoprostol Plus IV Tranexamic Acid for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage at Cesarean Section

The Millennium Development Goal of reducing the maternal mortality ratio by 75 % by 2015 will remain beyond our reach unless we prioritize the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage(PPH) in low-resource countries. Consequently, the administration of uterotonic drugs during cesarean section (CS) and in the third stage of labor for vaginal delivery has become essential to diminish the risk of PPH and improve maternal safety. Oxytocin is regarded as the gold standard uterotonic agent but only has a half-life of 4-10 min; therefore, at cesarean section oxytocin must be administered as a continuous intravenous infusion to attain sustained uterotonic activity throughout the surgical procedure and immediate postpartum period. Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analog proven in several randomized controlled trials to be effective in preventing PPH because of its strong uterotonic effects. In addition, misoprostol is inexpensive, stable at room temperature, and easy to administer. Misoprostol has been broadly studied in the prevention and treatment of PPH after vaginal delivery; however, its use in conjunction with CS has not been investigated as much. The buccal route is recognized as having the greatest benefit due to its rapid uptake, long-acting effect, and greatest bioavailability compared with other routes of misoprostol administration. Carbetocin is a long-acting synthetic analog of oxytocin that can be administered as a single-dose injection; intravenously administered carbetocin has a half-life of approximately 40 min. A single intravenous bolus of carbetocin produces a tetanic uterine contraction within 2 min and persists for an average of 60 min following injection. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of combined buccal misoprostol and IV tranexamic acid (TA)with intravenous carbetocin for prevention of PPH in patients with risk factors during cesarean section.