The Theory of Reductive Parallelism in Law

This paper introduces the Theory of Reductive Parallelism in Law as a comparative analytical framework between ideological legal systems and natural law theories. It argues that despite appearing as opposite models, both converge structurally toward the imposition of a single interpretive perspective that suppresses critical dialogue. The study highlights that coercion in law emerges not only from external political authority but also from internal moral absolutism, emphasizing the need for continuous critique to preserve legitimacy and social trust.