arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Tracing high-profile attention to questionable research as a case for funder due diligence
When questionable research has entered the scientific record, it stands the same chance as other literature of shaping national and international policy, clinical guidance, and research and development activities. This study uses a known authorship-for-sale network identified in August 2022 to exami
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tracing high-profile attention to questionable research as a case for funder due diligence#818674
- The Socio-Political Perspectives of Neuroethics: An Approach to Combat the Reproducibility Crisis in Science?#720636
- How COVID-19 affected academic publishing: a 3-year study of 17 million research papers#233609
- Why the Current Model of Academic Publishing Is Ethically Flawed—and What We Can Do to Change It#94091
- Medicine is not science#709521
Record · ID 808682
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive