ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
Few studies had investigated the effectiveness of segmental retraction. As a result of that, this study was concerned about comparing retraction rate of maxillary incisors between buccal and palatal mini-implant supported retraction groups in Class II division 1 non growing patients for 3 months interval.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Study - Transseptal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty#1140970
- Continuous Stitches Versus Simple Interrupted Stitches for Anterior Colporrhaphy#859408
- Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Esthetic Zone#855841
- Effect of Corticotomy on the Orthodontic Tooth Movement#870682
- Deep Marginal Acquisition With Thermacut Bur Vs. Functional Crown Lengthening in Deep Carious Lesions#1128041
Record · ID 810301
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive