ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms: Endo vs. Surgery
The aim of this multicenter randomized trial is to compare the endovascular repair versus conventional repair for ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms observed on CT scan in stable patients with suitable anatomy. The main awaited result is the significant reduction of the mortality of the conventional repair.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of the Effects of Open and Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair on Long-term Renal Function#870723
- TocILizumab in aorTitis in GCA (TILT)#852426
- Retrograde Ascending Dissection: Intraluminal Aortic Therapy#1115205
- Evaluation of the Castor Single Branch Stent Graft in Treatment of Acute Aortic Syndrome#979725
- Clinical Study for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair#806264
Record · ID 810988
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive