ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-fentanyl Infusions for Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures
Background: Different intravenous sedative drugs have been utilized for colonoscopy, with many anesthetists for painless sedation or monitored anesthesia care. The aim of this study was the quality of colonoscopy and the incidence of adverse events such as respiratory depression, hemodynamic instability, and failure to provide adequate sedation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl on Spinal Anesthesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion#256940
- Comparison of Remifentanil as a Sole Agent or in Combination With Midazolam Versus Fentanyl/Midazolam During Sedation for Colonoscopy#833024
- Satisfaction With Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Midazolam With Fentanyl Sedation for Endoscopy#1103246
- Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia ; Peritoneal Symptomatic Effects#866085
- Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine During Sedation for Colonoscopy.#1010079
Record · ID 811998
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive