ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cilostazol and Its Effects on Resumption of Meiosis in the Human Ovary
Combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) are the most commonly used hormonal form of birth control in the United States with at least 87% of women of reproductive age reporting oral contraceptive use at some point in their lives (9). Despite their frequent use, the six and twelve month discontinuation rates for oral contraceptive pills are 31 and 47 % respectively (17), with common reasons for discontinuation attributed to the side effects of abnormal bleeding, headache, and weight gain. Additionally, COCs are contraindicated in certain groups of women as outlined by The Centers for Disease Control Medical Eligibility Criteria (11). Given the high prevalence of oral contraceptive users who commonly discontinue use secondary to side effects or who are not eligible for use as a result of underlying health conditions, the development of novel oral non-hormonal methods that are equally effective at pregnancy prevention are warranted. This current study aims to evaluate the effect of an FDA approved drug, Cilostazol, on human oocyte maturation. Such a study has not been conducted to date. If Cilostazol demonstrates an ability in humans to affect resumption of meiosis, then this non-hormonal agent could be uses as a possible contraceptive agent in the future. This knowledge would have profound reproductive health implications. The investigators propose that women undergoing treatment with the FDA approved dose of 100mg PO every 12 hours of Cilostazol will demonstrate an impairment of egg maturation in comparison to paired historic controls following ovarian follicle stimulation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Compare Daily Ulipristal Acetate and Combined Oral Contraceptive Effects on Breast Epithelial Cell Proliferation#861461
- NuvaRing Versus Marvelon in the Coordination of In Vitro Fertilization Cycles#851386
- Induction With Misoprostol: Oral Mucosa Versus Vaginal Epithelium (IMPROVE)#899485
- A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E<sub>2</sub>tablets in labour induction at term#264834
- Multi-Center Study of New Medications to Treat Vaginal Infections#813307
Record · ID 812185
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive