ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Immediate Implant Placement in the Posterior Region Combining Sealing Socket Abutment and Peri-implant Socket Filling.
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the soft tissue contour changes after immediate implant placement combined to peri-implant socket filling with a sealing socket abutment (SSA) versus a standard healing abutment. The hypothesis is that the SSA better preserves the alveolar ridge profile in the cervical region compared to a conventional healing abutment. The secondary objectives aim to evaluate 3D hard tissue changes, peri-implant bone remodeling, soft tissue health, esthetic outcomes and the patients related outcome measures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft#1073238
- Multi-level Dimensional Changes at Immediate Implant Sites#806307
- Evaluation of the Prevalence Rate and Related Risk Factors of Ridge Preservation#900435
- Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence#1150388
- Peri-implant Tissues on Aesthetic Slim Abutment Galimplant (PSG)#966825
Record · ID 813362
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive