ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Fast-Track Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Dexmedetomidine and Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Opioid-Based Anesthesia
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized perioperative management by implementing evidence-based, patient-centered strategies that improve clinical outcomes, shorten hospital length of stay, and reduce healthcare costs. In cardiac surgery, ERAS has facilitated the adoption of fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA), which aims to achieve early extubation within 6-8 hours after surgery while maintaining patient safety. Compared with conventional high-dose opioid anesthesia, FTCA has been associated with shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays, earlier mobilization, faster recovery, and comparable rates of mortality and major postoperative complications. Despite these advantages, opioids remain the cornerstone of perioperative analgesia in cardiac surgery. Their use is associated with respiratory depression, delayed extubation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, ileus, urinary retention, delirium, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and increased healthcare costs, highlighting the need for opioid-sparing anesthetic strategies. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist, provides sedation, analgesia, and sympatholysis without clinically significant respiratory depression. In cardiac surgery, it improves hemodynamic stability, reduces perioperative opioid requirements, preserves spontaneous ventilation, and may decrease postoperative delirium, making it particularly suitable for fast-track extubation protocols. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a safe and effective regional analgesic technique. Compared with thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks, ESPB offers a lower risk of complications, is technically straightforward, and provides effective bilateral analgesia for cardiac surgery. Randomized studies have demonstrated substantial reductions in intraoperative opioid consumption, improved postoperative pain control, and prolonged opioid-free analgesia. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), ch
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Sevoflurane vs Desflurane on Early Recovery and Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Scheduled Non-Cardiac Surgery#846323
- Efficacy of TTMPB in Adult Cardiac Surgery#1030964
- Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery - Opioids or NSAID#875797
- A Study Comparing Two Analgesia/Sedation Regimens, Remifentanil/Propofol Versus Sufentanil/Propofol In Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients Requiring Analgesia And Sedation.#899828
- Sufentanil for Anesthesia Induction in Continuous Remifentanil Anesthesia#875822
Record · ID 813867
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive