ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Agonist Versus Classical HCG Trigger (Poor Responders, Normoresponders and High Responders)
Agonist triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols is being used during last years (among high responder patients to avoid OHSS). Indeed, agonist triggering is more physiologic than HCG triggering. Investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of both types of trigger among three different subsets of patients: 1. Poor responders. 2. Normo-responders 3. High responders Comparing both the number and the quality of achieved oocytes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- OBE001 Phase 2 Dose-finding Study Versus Placebo in Women Undergoing Embryo Transfer in the Context of IVF-ICSI#1173367
- FET-LET-2x2: Clinical Pregnancy Rates After Frozen Embryo Transfer in Natural and Modified Natural Cycles#1057064
- Assessment of Endometrial Thickness & Subendometrial Perfusion by 3D Power Doppler in Women With Unexplained Infertility and PCOS.#1086629
- Oxytocin Receptor Expression in Pregnancy#840500
- Effect of Theronomic Ova-All Care on Biomarkers of Ovarian Health in Adult Female With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome#840609
Record · ID 814022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive