ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM
The investigators aim to conduct a registry-based, randomized controlled trial to investigate if the robotic platform for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), when compared to the laparoscopic platform, will influence on early postoperative pain scores, wound morbidity (surgical site infections, surgical site occurrences and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention), ventral hernia recurrence rate and abdominal wall-specific quality of life.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair#1008117
- Laparscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Does the Choice of Self-fixated Mesh Matter?#1150671
- Sutured vs Sutureless Mesh Fixation for Onlay Ventral Hernia Repair#1113139
- Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Ventral Hernia Repair: a Single Institution Randomized Controlled Trial#901648
- Onstep Versus Lichtenstein, the Onli Trial.#1074742
Record · ID 814035
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive