eScholarship
metadata only
Toward a Process-Level Understanding of Correspondence Among Indirect Measures of Racial Threat Stereotypes
Previous research often reveals relatively poor correspondence among three prominent indirect measures configured to assess racial stereotypes: the Weapon Identification Task (WIT), the First-Person Shooter Task (FPST), and the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Importantly, these measures differ on a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Implicit Beliefs and Other Peculiarities#694819
- Social Psychology, Phenomenology, and the Indeterminate Content of Unreflective Racial Bias#750317
- The geography of the shooter bias: Regional context is linked to racialized threat perception#15872
- ‘I love women’: an explicit explanation of implicit bias test results#764977
- Racism and racial disparities in firearm violence: A scoping review.#309135
Record · ID 814592
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive