eScholarship
metadata only
Naked Self-Interest? Why the Legal Profession Resists Gatekeeping
This Article asks and answers the following question: why does the legal profession resist gatekeeping? Or, put another way, why do lawyers resist duties that require them to act to avert harm to their corporate client, its own shareholders, and – possibly – the capital markets? While acknowledging
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Economics, Behavioral Biology, and Law#1019587
- Business models in Legal Tech companies#1178475
- Data for 'The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences'#939603
- THE "UBERIZATION" OF HEALTHCARE: THE FORTHCOMING LEGAL STORM OVER MOBILE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY'S IMPACT ON THE MEDICAL PROFESSION.#615972
- Chronic Moral Injury in the Medical Professions#81399
Record · ID 814666
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive