arXiv (All)
open access
Mind the Gap: Theory-of-Mind-Grounded Friction for Epistemic Alignment
Productive dialogue alignment requires distinguishing \emph{surface coordination} (acknowledgments and smooth task progression) from \emph{epistemic alignment} (convergence of belief states); standard preference-based methods typically optimize response-level preferences without explicitly modeling
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mind the Gap: Theory-of-Mind-Grounded Friction for Epistemic Alignment#808781
- The Strategic Prompting Scale (SPS) for Measuring Metacognitive Regulation in Human-AI Interaction.#415569
- Structural Peer Review of ``Epistemia'' Walter Quattrociocchi#696708
- DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow#1110116
- Expressivism by force#778237
Record · ID 818773
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive