arXiv (All)
open access
Differential Privacy Meets Invariant Statistics: Some Conundrums in Quantifying Trade-Offs
This work was inspired by the question of whether data swapping, a popular form of statistical disclosure control used to protect many data products including three recent US Decennial Censuses, can satisfy differential privacy (DP). Given the existence of more than 200 formulations of DP (and count
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Differential Privacy Meets Invariant Statistics: Some Conundrums in Quantifying Trade-Offs#809231
- Bounds on the Posterior-to-Prior Ratios for Inclusion Belief under Bounded Differential Privacy#799674
- Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation#31218
- Statistical Limits and Efficient Algorithms for Differentially Private Federated Learning#200490
- Distribution-Preserving Statistical Disclosure Limitation#499564
Record · ID 819223
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive