arXiv (All)
open access
The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations
LLM-as-a-Judge, which leverages a large language model to evaluate natural language generated by another AI application or model, has become a standard, scalable approach for accelerating and extending costly human evaluation. Yet most work treats a judge as a static artifact, evaluating it once at
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations#809456
- Do Reasoning Representations Help Humans Evaluate LLM Outputs?#986647
- Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting#267681
- Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines#972904
- MERIT: Matching Expertise via Rubric-Informed Training for Reviewer Assignment#998239
Record · ID 819452
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive