arXiv (All)
open access
The Safeguard Worked. Is the LLM System Safer?
Safeguards in deployed LLM services are evaluated by refusal, attack success, and policy violation rates. Those rates characterize how a control performed on the requests it was tested on. A deployment has to answer a different question: how much help with harmful tasks the service still gives an at
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Safeguard Worked. Is the LLM System Safer?#627635
- DARWIN: Evolving Jailbreak Adversary and Guardrail for LLM Safety Evaluation and Protection#394342
- 16 U.S.C. § 409e — Administration, protection, and development#572193
- 20 U.S.C. § 1439 — Procedural safeguards#576007
- Quantifying LLM Safety Degradation Under Repeated Attacks Using Survival Analysis#180600
Record · ID 819962
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive