arXiv (All)
open access
Consistency Without Alignment: Item-Sensitive Language Models Indistinguishable From Random
Item-sensitivity, defined as whether a model's choice depends on the specific input rather than on its own output prior, is widely reported as evidence of task competence. We show this evidence is necessary but not sufficient using a forced-choice signalling task abstracted from the board game Decep
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- COUNTERMEM: World-Model Verified Counter-Factual Memory for Language Agents#1115830
- LLM Agents as Static Level-k Players in Behavioural Games#1012249
- From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models#1117798
- Choices Speak Louder than Questions#1131383
- FairLens: Benchmarking Fairness in Vision-Language Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making#822124
Record · ID 820011
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive