arXiv (All)
open access
Socrates went Nuclear: Comparing Interaction Strategies for AI systems in a Learning Context using Brain Sensing
Does unrestricted AI access bypass the cognitive effort required for learning, or does it streamline knowledge acquisition? This paper reports on a study where we compare three designs for user-AI interaction in a learning context: (1) an unrestricted conversational bot like ChatGPT, (2) a pedagogic
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Observations on Style Convergence and Cognitive Layer Convergence in Long-Term Dialogue － A Preliminary Observational Report on Human–AI and Human–Human Interactions#692569
- Generative AI in higher education: Ethical and behavioral factors influencing students’ intentions to use ChatGPT#19950
- Persona and Persuasive Framing in AI Voice Agents: A $2\times2$ Field Experiment with Children#1143383
- All too human? Identifying and mitigating ethical risks of Social AI#718203
- Using AI Tools Shifts the Cognitive Structures of Creative Problem-Solving in a Prompt-Based, Free Response Task#363720
Record · ID 820017
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive