arXiv (All)
open access
REVISE: Validity-Guided Recovery for Online Revisions in Agent Workflows
Agent revisions expose a fundamental correctness--efficiency trade-off during concurrent execution. Discarding ongoing work preserves latest-version correctness but wastes progress that may remain valid, whereas reusing prior work preserves efficiency but risks propagating stale state into outputs a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Granular Revision Operations to Meaningful Revision Units: Evaluating LLMs for Revision Boundary Detection#1118793
- Serving a Revisable World: Versioned Execution for Interruptible Agents#1160977
- Serving a Revisable World: Versioned Execution for Interruptible Agents#1156095
- Fluid Notarization: Verifiable Evolution of Concurrently Edited Structured Documents#1013043
- Fluid Notarization: Verifiable Evolution of Concurrently Edited Structured Documents#965323
Record · ID 820066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive