arXiv (All)
open access
PlanarBench: Evaluating LLM Spatial Reasoning via Planar Graph Drawing
Existing LLM graph benchmarks typically ask models to answer graph-theoretic questions or compute symbolic solutions rather than construct spatial layouts. Within-task difficulty is also primarily stratified by vertex count. However, existing research also suggests that task difficulty is more close
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Official Review · ICLR 2026#787092
- Chain-of-Thought Degrades Visual Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs#31317
- GeoBenchLLM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Geo-Related Tasks#440357
- MetaSpatial: Reinforcing 3D Spatial Reasoning in VLMs for the Metaverse#342724
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#799472
Record · ID 820492
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive