arXiv (All)
open access
ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues
Reproducing research results from papers and released code is central to scientific progress. Existing works have introduced benchmarks to evaluate whether LLM agents can assist with reproducibility, but they are difficult to scale due to their reliance on substantial manual effort for data curation
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues#282774
- RepoTrace: Browser-Assisted Evidence Collection for GitHub Research Datasets#620363
- RepoTrace: Browser-Assisted Evidence Collection for GitHub Research Datasets#618684
- RepoTrace: Browser-Assisted Evidence Collection for GitHub Research Datasets#343532
- On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories#138993
Record · ID 820515
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive