arXiv (All)
open access
Can LLMs Reliably Self-Report Adversarial Prefills, and How?
Prior work shows that large language models (LLMs) exhibit varying degrees of introspective capability on benign tasks. We extend the question to safety contexts and examine how reliably a model can recognize that its own prior response was elicited by an adversarial prefill attack. Across ten open-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM Finetuning#799861
- A Machine Learning Framework for Detecting and Mitigating Adversarial Prompt Attacks in Large Language Models#402307
- Hearing the Unspoken: Language Model Priors for Acoustic Adversarial Attacks#266128
- Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics: Layer-wise Trajectories of Adversarial Intent in Large Language Models#1071316
- Contextual Contamination: A Descriptive Case Study of Drift in a Goal-Aware LLM Dialogue Amplified by Gender-Bias#204181
Record · ID 820525
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive