arXiv (All)
open access
Zero Hallucination, by Construction: Hallucination-Aware Layered Oversight for Trustworthy Enterprise AI
Enterprises will not deploy AI agents they cannot trust, and the most-cited reason for distrust is hallucination: confident, fluent output that is simply not true. The common response is to wait for a model that does not hallucinate. We argue that this is the wrong target. Large language models are,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLMs Trust Their Own: Identity-Dependent Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems#1118207
- Game Theory Driven Multi-Agent Framework Mitigates Language Model Hallucination#353112
- A Formal Account of AI Trustworthiness: Connecting Intrinsic and Perceived Trustworthiness#72231
- Philosophers Without Philosophy: Conceptual Boundary Integrity in AI-Consciousness Discourse#694907
- Philosophers Without Philosophy: Conceptual Boundary Integrity in AI-Consciousness Discourse#689597
Record · ID 820557
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive