arXiv (All)
open access
Whether LLMs Can Navigate Beliefs and Facts Depends on How You Phrase It
Humans naturally form and express beliefs in daily communication, e.g., "I think the answer is 3" or "I suppose that's right." Such beliefs inevitably intertwine with fact and knowledge, making the ability to handle them in tandem desirable for large language models (LLMs), as they are increasingly
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ‘Value’ as Semantic Attractor: A Short Note#70878
- The Anatomy of a Truth Direction: Knowledge-Dependent Dimensionality, a Relational Law, and a Shared Category Geometry in Small Language Models#920388
- Epistemic Normativity & Epistemic Autonomy: The True Belief Machine#74102
- Moral Competence Before Moral Content: Why LLM Agents Lack the Prerequisites for Coherent Alignment#971991
- AraDynFact: Dynamic Evaluation of Factual Knowledge in Arabic#1130045
Record · ID 820612
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive