arXiv (All)
open access
RealSWE: A Compositional Evaluation of Coding Agents under Realistic User Requests
Coding agents are now commonly evaluated on the SWE-bench family of benchmarks, whose tasks are built from curated GitHub issues: long, structured, and information-rich. Real user requests, however, are typically far shorter and less structured. To characterize this gap, we define a six-category inf
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Deep Agentic Search for Repository-Level Code Question Answering: An Empirical Study#424048
- SWE-bench Science: Can Coding Agents Resolve Engineering Tasks in Science?#820620
- Open-Source vs. Commercial Coding Assistants: A 2025 Comparison of DeepSeek R1, Qwen 2.5 and Claude 3.7#73346
- ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance#819420
- ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance#809427
Record · ID 820653
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive