arXiv (All)
open access
Perceptible or Not? Diagnosing Passive Fingerprints for Speech Deepfake Attribution
Passive fingerprints (intrinsic traces naturally left by generators) have been shown to enable attribution in speech deepfake detection, yet their persistence, reproducibility, and content-independence remain unverified. Moreover, no prior work distinguishes perceptible from imperceptible fingerprin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Last Mile of Deepfake Speech Detection: An Industry-Academia Experience Report#463154
- Probing Speaker Identity Sensitivity in Audio Deepfake Detectors#984202
- From Scores to Evidence: Auditable Decisions Can Improve Speech Deepfake Detection#1160758
- Towards Zero-Shot Attribution of Synthetic Speech via Audio-Text Contrastive Retrieval#1035977
- Learning as Deepfakes Evolve: RF-Prompt for Continual Audio Deepfake Detection#1141902
Record · ID 820777
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive