arXiv (All)
open access
RISA: Response Inspection and Selective Actions for Refusal Calibration in Large Language Models
Reliable refusal behavior requires Large Language Models (LLMs) to reject harmful prompts with only answering benign ones. Incorrect refusal behavior can either expose users to harmful responses or prevent users from obtaining useful answers. Training-time alignment improves refusal behavior by upda
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- RISA: Response Inspection and Selective Actions for Refusal Calibration in Large Language Models#627624
- A Machine Learning Framework for Detecting and Mitigating Adversarial Prompt Attacks in Large Language Models#402307
- Hierarchical Group-Conditional Conformal Risk Control for Selective Prediction in Language Models#405700
- RAS: Measuring LLM Safety Through Refusal Alignment#306955
- ASCII Attack: Recontextualising Harmful Requests as Artistic Critique in Large Language Models#822607
Record · ID 820800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive