arXiv (All)
open access
In-Context Neurofeedback: Can LLMs Control Their Internal Representations through Privileged Access?
Whether large language models (LLMs) can control their own internal representations matters for both machine metacognition and AI safety. A recent study applied neurofeedback to LLMs and claimed that they can control their internal representations. However, the reported control may rely on superfici
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Metacognitive judgments in a complex span task : Evidence for a monitoring-control loop in working memory#156100
- Beyond Correction: Epistemic Safety as a Mediator for Policy Transfer in Large Language Models#105624
- Biased and Inattentive Responding Drive Apparent Metacognitive Biases in Mental Health#186602
- Self-Regulating Cognitive Architecture (SRCA): A Theoretical Framework for Artificial Awareness#717756
- AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems: A Control Allocation Architecture for Preserving Epistemic Agency in Hybrid Human-AI Cognition#971863
Record · ID 820904
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive