arXiv (All)
open access
Post-Training Science for Supervised Fine-Tuning
Every supervised fine-tuning run forces the same chain of decisions, such as learning rate, batch size, LoRA or full fine-tuning, how many epochs, which optimiser, and what data to feed the model. Each of these is typically rediscovered from scratch for every new model and dataset. Here we measure t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Parameter Importance is Not Static: Evolving Parameter Isolation for Supervised Fine-Tuning#14018
- Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM Finetuning#799861
- Canalization Before Generalization: Grokking as a Dynamical Probe#971867
- AcOrch: Accelerating Sampling-based GNN Training under CPU-NPU Heterogeneous Environments#246523
- OPEN-1B: A Fully Auditable Training Run#1123745
Record · ID 821199
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive