arXiv (All)
open access
How Correct Is Your Answer? A Semantic Correctness Framework for Open QA Evaluation
Reliable evaluation of open-ended question answering remains a bottleneck for measuring answer correctness of modern LLMs. Unlike multiple-choice tasks, free-form answers may be correct in many surface forms and may fail in qualitatively different ways, including incompleteness, contradiction, overg
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- No “Easy” Answers to Ontological Category Questions#713556
- Relativist 'know': 'wh'-complements and intermediate exhaustivity#742003
- Nyāya as a Pre-Inferential Validation Layer: Addressing the Epistemic Incompleteness of Aristotelian Logical Reasoning Systems#109223
- Nyāya as a Pre-Inferential Validation Layer: Addressing the Epistemic Incompleteness of Aristotelian Logical Reasoning Systems#89129
- Beyond Energy: When Sustainability Dimensions Reshape LLM Serving Decisions#1130225
Record · ID 821309
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive