arXiv (All)
open access
On the Reliability of Generative Augmentation: A Wasserstein-Based Theoretical and Empirical Study
Generative data augmentation is widely used to mitigate class imbalance, yet its theoretical effect on downstream generalization remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop a statistical framework for conditional generative augmentation and analyze its impact on classification risk. We forma
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SAGE: Subpopulation-Aware Generative Enhancement for Mitigating Spurious Correlations#821038
- When Does Synthetic Data Augmentation Improve Score-Based Imbalanced Classification?#307004
- Self-Ensembling Techniques in Semi-Supervised Learning#695987
- Exposing Blind Spots in Deep Imbalanced Regression Evaluation#1051645
- AROID: Improving Adversarial Robustness Through Online Instance-Wise Data Augmentation#1143556
Record · ID 821345
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive