arXiv (All)
open access
Efficient SWE Agent Benchmarking via Trajectory-Aware Evaluation
Evaluating software engineering agents on realistic benchmarks is costly, since each task may require multi-step code exploration, modification, and test execution. Existing efficient evaluation methods select representative subsets to estimate full-benchmark performance, but are largely result-only
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trajectory-Aware Benchmark Subset Selection for Cost-Efficient Software Engineering Agent Regression Testing#1051324
- Trajectory-Aware Benchmark Subset Selection for Cost-Efficient Software Engineering Agent Regression Testing#1028764
- SWE-Bench Pro Verified: A Reliable Benchmark for Software Engineering Agents#1011199
- SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle#180726
- What Does an Agentic Software Engineering Benchmark Measure? Profiling Task Demands and Agent Behaviour Beyond What Category Labels Reveal#821224
Record · ID 821624
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive