arXiv (All)
open access
CLASE: A Hybrid Method for Chinese Legalese Stylistic Evaluation
Legal text generated by large language models (LLMs) can usually achieve reasonable factual accuracy, but it frequently fails to adhere to the specialised stylistic norms and linguistic conventions of legal writing. In order to improve stylistic quality, a crucial first step is to establish a reliab
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the translation from quantified modal logic to counterpart theory#72858
- The judicial dictionary, of words and phrases judicially interpreted : to which has been added statutory definitions#199098
- The judicial dictionary, of words and phrases judicially interpreted : to which has been added statutory definitions#198894
- De se marking, logophoricity, and ziji#97535
- The World's Countability: On the Mastery of Divided Reference and the Controversy over the Count/Mass Distinction in Chinese#110132
Record · ID 821787
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive