arXiv (All)
open access
When Literature Data Mislead Artificial Intelligence in Materials Discovery
and-sciencecomputational-engineeringfinanceh-2-8i-2-6information-retrievalmachine-learningmaterials-science
Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly treats scientific literature as a data source for building databases, training predictive models, and guiding discovery. Yet literature-derived datasets often assume that reported experimental values are internally consistent and directly reusable. Here, we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search#133422
- Raw Data as the Verification Layer: Why AI-Driven Materials Discovery Needs Experimental Infrastructure.#358241
- Leveraging Large Language Models to Address Data Scarcity in Machine Learning: Applications in Graphene Synthesis#1012002
- Artificial intelligence in materials science and engineering: Current landscape, key challenges, and future trajectories#354002
- Building informative materials datasets beyond targeted objectives#158547
Record · ID 822061
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive