arXiv (All)
open access
How Fast Do Agents Rot? An Empirical Study of Long-Horizon Degradation in LLM Agents for Production Decision-Making
Production deployments of large language model (LLM) agents remain unreliable on long, multi-step workflows even as benchmark success rates climb steadily. We argue this gap is largely an artifact of task horizon: benchmarks are dominated by short-to-medium horizons where success remains high, while
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When the Model Retires: An Empirical Study of LLM Migration in Open-Source Applications#1105846
- LLM-based Hardware Development with Hierarchical IRs and End-to-End Multi-Agent Workflow#818715
- LLM-based Hardware Development with Hierarchical IRs and End-to-End Multi-Agent Workflow#808723
- Beyond the Model: Demystifying Harness Effects in Software Engineering Agents#1116790
- What Happens When the Model Eats the Stack? Rethinking the Research Agenda for Data Agents to Withstand the Bitter Lesson#925504
Record · ID 822097
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive