arXiv (All)
open access
Thinking effort aligns between humans and reasoning models in abductive reasoning
A major question in cognitive modeling concerns the behavioral alignment between large language models and humans across linguistic and non-linguistic tasks. Unlike standard LLMs, large reasoning models (LRMs) are optimized with reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards, encouraging correct sol
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Humans Disengage, Reasoning Models Persist: Separating Difficulty Registration from Deliberation Allocation#1083122
- Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models#16580
- Calibration, Not Answer Selection: Distilling Internal Confidence in Reasoning Models#1118002
- Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning#798609
- Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning#797196
Record · ID 822288
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive