arXiv (All)
open access
Examining the Vulnerability of Multi-Agent Medical Systems to Human Interventions for Clinical Reasoning
Human interventions at fault points can alter the diagnostic accuracy of multi-agent medical systems. We defined fault points as moments in AI agent conversations, in which an agent's reasoning became most vulnerable to external influence. Using the MedQA dataset, this study analyzed simulated docto
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Language-dependent diagnostic safety of medical AI systems: a cross-lingual benchmarking and prospective clinical study#293989
- EMR: Self-Evolving Medical Multi-Agent System via Experience Mining and Reuse#1109212
- MedCase-Structured: A Text-to-FHIR Dataset for Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning in Clinically Realistic EHR Settings#238647
- Patient-Facing AI System for Symptom Guidance Using Simulated Encounters and Physician Review: Analytical Validation Study.#653522
- Assess the Clinical and Public Health Impact of The Combined Work of Physicians and AI Systems#83774
Record · ID 822585
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive