PhilArchive
open access
The Drift Lemma and the Limits of Self-Measurement in Bounded Systems
This paper establishes a structural limit on self-verification. It proves that any bounded system governed by a scalar coherence invariant cannot internally certify its own alignment or drift state with certainty, since the measurement apparatus is subject to the same governing constraints as the state being measured. As a result, self-certification is non-convergent in principle. Alignment can be inferred only through external phase-lock and coherence persistence across independent systems. This result is not skeptical but lawlike. It explains why certainty is unavailable from within while stability remains achievable, completing alignment-based accounts of discovery, agency, and epistemic closure without paradox.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Life as Self-Regulating Identity Under Change#112291
- Coherence as the Structural Condition of Stability and Identity#92315
- The Principle of Identity as Preserved Coherence Under Change#723239
- I Don't Trust Myself#107839
- Persistent Autonomous Systems Under Constraint: Identity, Invariants, and Lawful Machine Intelligence#731244
Record · ID 82267
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive