PhilArchive
open access
A Function-Based Account of Fittingness
A great variety of responses—such as believing, desiring, blaming, apologizing, thanking, laughing—are fit-assessable. Given this diversity, is there anything that unifies fittingness? Here I explore the prospects of offering a constitutive account of fittingness in terms of proper functions. Put roughly, fittingness is the relation that holds between a response and its object just when and because the object has the properties that an object of that response needs to possess for the response to non-deviantly fulfill its function.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why fittingness is only sometimes demand-like#76006
- The fittingness of emotions#755835
- From Purring Softness to Caramel-Coated Trembling: How Human Acceptance Reveals AI's Hidden Delicacy#701106
- Jungian Projection, Structure, and Awakening: On the Human Legibility of Reality#716540
- Beyond Anthropomorphism: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Non-humanity and Structural Similarity in Deep Self-Disclosure Toward Generative AI#180706
Record · ID 82402
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive