Kavarizadeh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1133, 2026 fc 1133 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1133, (canlii), imm-6626-25, 2026, citizenship and immigration, permanent residence, processing of application, mandamus order compelling ircc to process and determine permanent residency application, application referred to security screening and security screening ongoing, military service information requested to continue processing, determination to be completed within 90 days, mandamus ordered, administrative law, judicial review, mandamus, apotex inc v canada (attorney general), conille v canada (minister of citizenship and immigration), whether unreasonable delay established under conille factors, security screening delay not shown to be non, routine, no satisfactory justification for lengthy delay, prima facie entitlement to mandamus found, mandamus ordered, administrative law, remedies, discretionary bars, benison v canada (royal canadian mounted police external review committee), whether final four apotex criteria bar mandamus, balance of convenience and other bars require evidentiary basis, no evidence of obvious or unacceptable administrative cost or chaos, discretion not exercised to refuse relief, mandamus ordered, administrative law, procedural fairness, legitimate expectations and good faith, agraira v canada (public safety and emergency preparedness), canada (attorney general) v galipeau, whether ircc website processing times create a clear, unambiguous representation, general processing, time information not a specific, date commitment, record does not support bad faith, legitimate expectations and bad faith arguments rejected, citizenship and immigration, judicial review, damages, claim for damages for delay in processing permanent residence application, no reasonable cause of action or basis in law identified, no evidence of damages provided, damages claim dismissed, claim dismissed