ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pudendal Block Versus Caudal Block for Hypospadias
The aim of this prospective randomized study is to assess the analgesic efficacy and duration of Pudendal block compared with Caudal block for pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias surgery concerning intraoperative analgesic and also postoperative total analgesic consumption within 24 hours.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Analgesic Efficiency of Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penil Block for Circumsion in Children#804694
- Does the Single Use of Intravenous Dexamethasone Enhance Analgesic Quality of Pudendal Analgesia in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery?#872717
- Comparison of Caudal Block Combined With General Anesthesia and Penile Block and Intravenous Fentanyl in Pediatric Surgeries#830867
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacral Espb and Caudal Block for Pain Management After Urogenital Surgeries in Children#860787
- Comparison of Caudal Block Versus Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Repair Surgery#824967
Record · ID 825319
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive