ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Influence of the Different Types of Tibial Fixation in the Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee: Osseous Integration, Ligament Maturation and Clinical Results.
Influence of different tibial fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: bone integration, graft maturation, and clinical outcomes. Primary Objective To assess whether any of the four tibial fixation techniques is superior in terms of: Graft-bone integration (CT/MRI), Graft maturation (MRI), Clinical outcomes (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner scores; manual and instrumented knee stability with KT-1000 arthrometer). Secondary Objectives Compare clinical outcomes among groups (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner). Compare re-rupture rates and patient satisfaction. Study Design Prospective randomized trial. The study will be registered in the international Clinical Trials registry. Inclusion Criteria Age ≥18 years. Complete ACL rupture treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons. Exclusion Criteria Age ≥55 years. Patients treated with allografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, or quadriceps tendon grafts. Malpositioned tunnels (evaluated by MRI at 6 months postop). Previous knee surgery. Femoral or tibial deformities. Multiligament injuries. Note: Soft tissue procedures (e.g., meniscal repair) are not exclusion criteria. Randomization Patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized (via Research Randomizer: https://www.randomizer.org/ ) into 3 groups: Group A (TORN): bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel. Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter. Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button/plate. Sample size: 37 patients per group, 111 total. Follow-up Radiographic, CT, and MRI evaluation pre-op, at 15 days, and at 1 year post-op. Clinical and radiological follow-up for 1 year. Statistical Analysis In the prospective phase, Student's t-test will be performed for comparison of pre- and postoperative variables. All variables will also be compared between
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Clinical Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction#1075586
- Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing PLLA and PLDLA/HA/β-TCP interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: CT scans, MRI and clinical outcomes.#338528
- Evaluation of Clinical and Biomechanical Correlation During Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury#966439
- Tibial Tunnel Placement for ACL Reconstruction#800502
- BioCleanse Tibialis Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Study#834872
Record · ID 826177
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive