ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Hernia Repair in Multiply Morbid Patients
Support of a ventral hernia repair with a prosthetic mesh has been demonstrated to result in a diminished rate of hernia recurrence. The patient with co-morbidities undergoing hernia repair is at increased risk of wound related complications, which may be exacerbated by the choice of prosthetic mesh, and which are known to influence the ultimate rate of hernia recurrence. It is hypothesized that patients receiving a mesh of biologic origin may experience fewer wound related complications and hence at least an equal rate of hernia recurrence, compared to those receiving a synthetic mesh.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias#879027
- Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair#867377
- Study of Absorbable Biosynthetic Meshes in Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair#852866
- Comparison of Two Mesh/Fixation Concepts for Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair#888839
- Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh#1112440
Record · ID 826442
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive