Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

A Pain Study Comparing Two Commonly Used Medications to Treat Pain After Bowel Surgery

Jacques E. Chelly · 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2008
Open Source ↗
na
This research study is testing whether the local anesthetic lidocaine is as effective as ropivacaine for post-operative pain control in continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve blocks. Ropivacaine and Lidocaine are FDA-approved drugs that has been successfully used in this hospital for post-operative pain control for the past few years, thus has become the standard drugs used for this nerve block. Lidocaine has numerous potential advantages over ropivacaine, such as faster onset of action, better safety profile and greater anti-inflammatory action. Catheters placed near both sides of a patient's spine for postoperative pain control are called thoracic paravertebral nerve blocks and are a part of routine care. Through those catheters, a "numbing" medication, or local anesthetic, to block the transmission of pain from the surgical incision to the spinal cord, thus reducing pain. The research part of the study is whether subjects will receive either the local anesthetic lidocaine or ropivacaine. The goal of this study is to determine whether the lidocaine controls pain better and facilitates a faster recovery after abdominal surgery than ropivacaine. In this research study, the investigators will compare patient-reported pain scores, any additional pain medication requirements for adequate pain control, time it takes for bowel function to return to normal following surgery, as well as the incidence of any side effects, such as numbness and weakness, subjects may experience between those receiving lidocaine versus those receiving ropivacaine. The investigators will screen 100 patients and enroll 60 subjects into this study.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 826887
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive