ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Fiberoptic Intubation With Fiberoptic Intubation Through an Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Infants and Small Children
The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare the effect of operator experience on the ability to use fiberoptic-guided intubation in children less than two years old, with and without the use of an air-Q as a conduit. The question the investigators are trying to answer is: Does the operator experience make a significant difference in the time for successful fiberoptic guided tracheal intubation with and without the use of an air-Q intubating laryngeal airway?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Continuous Sedation vs Daily Sedation Interruption in Ventilated Children#1172204
- Premedication for Non-Emergency Endotracheal Intubation In the NICU#866597
- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Pediatric Patients With Subglottic Stenosis Who Undergo Balloon Dilatation#811360
- Parent-QoL and Sleep Disordered Breathing#1112892
- Sub-Paraspinal Block in Nuss Patients. A Pilot Project#888327
Record · ID 827111
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive