ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Quad Helix vs RME for Posterior Cross-bite in Egyptian Children
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Quad Helix (QH) appliance versus Rapid Maxillary Expanders (RME) in treating posterior cross-bite in Egyptian children during the mixed dentition stage. The study will also assess patient comfort and pain levels associated with each appliance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Alternatives for Reducing Tics in Tourette Syndrome (TS): A Study of TEV-50717 (Deutetrabenazine) for the Treatment of Tourette Syndrome in Children and Adolescents#811342
- Contemporary surgical approaches for the closure of maxillary sinus defects with clinical cases from the authors’ practice#366032
- Evaluation of Muscle Activity in Unilateral Posterior Crossbite#915169
- Chesterfield Micro-implant Study Involving Three Types of Anchorage Methods in Orthodontics#1162282
- Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) Diagnostic Concordance Between Physiotherapist and Surgeon#807396
Record · ID 827851
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive