ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Implant/Abutment Module Stability of Original vs Compatible Connections
Together with materials and type of retention, the stability of the implant abutment connection represents one of the key factor for the success rate of an implant supported restoration. The recent diffusion of high quality and easy to use CAD/CAM systems has contributed to market launch of a number of competing companies that offer the so called "clonical" or "compatible" restorative components. Although they are claimed to be identical, the original abutments are supposed to present maximum accuracy and consequently lower microleakage. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial will be to analyze the implant abutment junction stability comparing implant-supported crowns restored with original components and compatible non-original abutments. The hypothesis is that original components will present significantly better stability than non-original abutments.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Crestal Bone Response to Narrow vs. Regular Tie-Base in Subcrestal Implants#907614
- Resin-Cement Type Influence on Cement Remnants in Implant-Supported Restorations#841615
- Tooth Alignment, Coating Loss, Colour Change And Patient Perception Of Aesthetic Archwires: A Randomised Controlled Trial#190856
- Comparative evaluation of screw loosening and joint integrity across different implant-abutment connection types utilizing stock and CAD/CAM abutments under cyclic loading.#615838
- How does cement choice affect screw stability in implant-supported restorations with different abutment angulations? An in vitro study / Shaza Taher Mohamed Bishti, Katarzyna Hubryj, Martin Homa, Stefan Wolfart, Taşkın Tuna#675405
Record · ID 828119
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive