ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With Mesh & Sacrocervicopexy for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse
This study is aimed to compare the efficiency of two uterus-preserving laparoscopic methods to treat uterine prolapse in a randomized controlled trial. Laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (LLSM) will be compared with laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LS). Both procedures are known as sufficient uterus preserving methods. LLSM was introduced to be an alternative to others with avoiding dissection of promontory and therefore being safer, faster and feasible technique.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LAparoscopic Preventive PRErectal Mesh#856364
- Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc)#898775
- Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant Technique of Transvaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#860546
- Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse#1126130
- The Clinical Outcome of TVM or LSC Mesh Suspension for POP#870705
Record · ID 828220
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive